> Does anyone out there have a 500Mhz machine and are able to use your
> BP7.01 CRT unit without ANY problems? If so, please tell me where you
> got your patch.

> I still have a 133 Mhz machine, but I might want to upgrade someday and
> I'd like to know what to expect. :-) Thanks in advance.

> "Patrick D. Rockwell" wrote:

> > Does anyone out there have a 500Mhz machine and are able to use your
> > BP7.01 CRT unit without ANY problems? If so, please tell me where
you
> > got your patch.

> > I still have a 133 Mhz machine, but I might want to upgrade someday
and
> > I'd like to know what to expect. :-) Thanks in advance.

> I used the standard patch that converts the delay counter to a longint
> type.  It's pretty standard, and to my knowledge works on at least
> Celleron 333 machines.  To date however, it's unnecessary on AMD K6/II
> up to 400Mhz tested here.

> --
> For the latest Beta of Huffman Compression Engine II
> Win32: http://www.osirusoft.com/wlh7021r.zip
> Linux: http://www.osirusoft.com/llh7021r.zip
> Dos: http://www.osirusoft.com/dlh7021r.zip
> Ways to get here from there:
> ICQ http://wwp.mirabilis.com/12016722
> ftp://ftp.osirusoft.com
> http://www.osirusoft.com

>  * Origin: Orange, CA, 714-532-15860101 (1:103/301)

>Hi. Thanks for your reply. I hear that there is more than one patch out
>there. Where did you get the one
>that you mentioned above?

> >Hi. Thanks for your reply. I hear that there is more than one patch out
> >there. Where did you get the one
> >that you mentioned above?

> Evidently too few people have both read and thought about the section of
> the metaFAQ which reads :

>  -  If you have used one of the RTE200 patches. You are unlikely to get
>     any useful help unless you tell us: whose patch; from where;
>     BP/TP; Version Number; Real or Protected Mode; DOS/Win3/Win9x/?; and
>     *exactly* what the symptoms were and what the output was.

> The number of fixes is legion; and some are reputable.

>> The number of fixes is legion; and some are reputable.

><sigh> :-( If your assumption is that I'm having an RTE200 problem, I'm
>not. As I said in my original post, I still have a 133 Mhz computer but
>I want to know what to expect when I upgrade. I simply want to know if
>anyone has beaten the 500 Mhz limit with ANY ONE of the patches that
>are out there on any type of machine for BP7.01.

>> JRS:  In article <38171A8D.22E2...@thegrid.net> of Wed, 27 Oct 1999
>> 08:30:22 in news:comp.lang.pascal.borland, Patrick D. Rockwell
>> <prockw...@thegrid.net> wrote:
>> >Harvey Arkawy wrote:
>> >> I have software out there that was fixed with the new patch.  My
>> >> customers are using Pentiums upto 500 MHz with no problems.

>> >Hi. Thanks for your reply. I hear that there is more than one patch out
>> >there. Where did you get the one
>> >that you mentioned above?

>> Evidently too few people have both read and thought about the section of
>> the metaFAQ which reads :

>>  -  If you have used one of the RTE200 patches. You are unlikely to get
>>     any useful help unless you tell us: whose patch; from where;
>>     BP/TP; Version Number; Real or Protected Mode; DOS/Win3/Win9x/?; and
>>     *exactly* what the symptoms were and what the output was.

>> The number of fixes is legion; and some are reputable.

><sigh> :-( If your assumption is that I'm having an RTE200 problem, I'm not.
> ...