Hi Mark.
What a good initiative!.
Basically I think the ADOExpress is a pretty good job.
However, it seems to be geared towards the desktop developers.
I do not develop desktop systems, so it is kind of irritating that:
* The default properties for Query is clientside,keyset,optimistic as
opposite to the MS-default: Serverside,forwardonly,readonly.
* Whenever you change the SQL-property, it tries to open the connection, and
LEAVES it open, so I would be happy, if I had a 'TADOServerQuery', which
does not open anything in the IDE.
So my basic wish is to derive 2 sets of components, one for the 'desktop
people', and one for the 'server people'.
And of course to minimize the VCL-overhead for use in multithreaded servers,
meaning, that I personally don't use events in a thread.
As you can see, it is not a critical issue, but it is a lot of work to
remember to redefine the properties each time you span a new thread with a
Query in it.
Well, it may make you happy to know, that I have used the ADOExpress
succesfully in upgrading a 4-tier Web-solution ( Instead of BDE ). Once I
got hold of the issues, it was not so hard to migrate the application.
--
Med venlig hilsen/Regards
Stig Johansen - s...@w3data.dk
W3 Data - mai...@w3data.dk
Mark Edington (Borland) <meding...@nolunchmeat.com> wrote in message
news:86kotd$on117@bornews.borland.com...
Quote
> Ok folks, here is your big chance.
> If you have any features that you are dying to see in the next release of
> Delphi/ADOExpress now is the time to speak up. Please post any requests
for new
> features in a reply to this message.
> Of course, I can't promise that your request will make it into the product
(that
> goes without saying, right?), but the responses will be helpful for
determining
> the final feature set.
> If you would, please keep this thread relatively clean. By that I mean
please
> don't tangent off into side discussions on a particular feature request
after it
> is made. If there is something you want to discuss further with the
message
> poster, please start a new thread. "Me Too" responses are ok because they
help
> indicate the interest level, but once there are 4 or 5 there isn't any
need to
> chime in further.
> Ok, those are the ground rules. Remember to follow newsgroup etiquette,
and no
> absolutely no blows below the belt!
> Mark