Board index » delphi » Re: I am tired, I am really tired...

Re: I am tired, I am really tired...


2007-01-05 03:18:37 PM
delphi103
Dmitry Streblechenko writes:
Quote
My checkbook is open... Just say "Type Library editor bugs are fixed"
and the check will be in the mail the next day.
A friend of mine has some beefs with the type library editor, too. Do
you have some specifics? Some QC entries should be made.
--
Regards,
Bruce McGee
Glooscap Software
 
 

Re: I am tired, I am really tired...

David Clegg writes:
Quote
David Dean [CodeGear] writes:

>When I was only a volunteer sysop, I would leave a comment that
>something was missing and wait about a month to see if the author
>ever replied.

Thats the same approach I am currently taking with all CodeCentral bugs
(which I triage every night). The author has one month to deliver more
information before I will close the report.

Does the system send emails to the author?
Cause if it does not, how does the author knows a reply has been given?
 

Re: I am tired, I am really tired...

"OBones" writes <news:XXXX@XXXXX.COM>:
Quote
Does the system send emails to the author?
No as far as I have seen there are no notifications. Perhaps a part to
enhance functionality?
Quote
Cause if it does not, how does the author knows a reply has been given?
That's right!
--
cu,
Michael
 

Re: I am tired, I am really tired...

OBones writes:
Quote
Does the system send emails to the author?
It does if the author explicitly asks to 'watch' a report. It is also
possible to watch entire categories, which is what I do for CodeCentral
so I can see when any reports are added or have any changes made to them
--
Cheers,
David Clegg
XXXX@XXXXX.COM
cc.codegear.com/Author/72299
QualityCentral. The best way to bug CodeGear about bugs.
qc.codegear.com
"Pffft. Who needs English? I am never going to England." - Homer Simpson
 

Re: I am tired, I am really tired...

David Clegg schrieb:
Quote
OBones writes:

>Does the system send emails to the author?

It does if the author explicitly asks to 'watch' a report. It is also
possible to watch entire categories, which is what I do for CodeCentral
so I can see when any reports are added or have any changes made to them

Afaik that doesn't work for the web client, does it? I just (couple of
hours ago) requested a new feature for the web client: editing the steps
of some entered request.
Greetings
Markus
 

Re: I am tired, I am really tired...

OBones writes:
Quote
David Clegg writes:
>David Dean [CodeGear] writes:
>
>>When I was only a volunteer sysop, I would leave a comment that
>>something was missing and wait about a month to see if the author
>>ever replied.
>
>Thats the same approach I am currently taking with all CodeCentral bugs
>(which I triage every night). The author has one month to deliver more
>information before I will close the report.
>
Does the system send emails to the author?
Cause if it does not, how does the author knows a reply has been given?
There are great experiences with the Lazarus Bug Tracker:
www.freepascal.org/mantis/my_view_page.php
 

Re: I am tired, I am really tired...

Markus.Humm writes:
Quote
Afaik that doesn't work for the web client, does it?
Sorry, I don't know. I use Jeremy Norths excellent JED, QC client,
which can be downloaded from www.jed-software.com/.
--
Cheers,
David Clegg
XXXX@XXXXX.COM
cc.codegear.com/Author/72299
QualityCentral. The best way to bug CodeGear about bugs.
qc.codegear.com
"Are you sure this is the Sci-Fi Convention? it is full of nerds!" -
Homer Simpson
 

Re: I am tired, I am really tired...

David Clegg schrieb:
Quote
Markus.Humm writes:

>Afaik that doesn't work for the web client, does it?

Sorry, I don't know. I use Jeremy Norths excellent JED, QC client,
which can be downloaded from www.jed-software.com/.

Yes I sometimes use it but I find the web client sometimes just more
user friendly. (nothing about JEDs software, the CFBuilder is good! and
the QC client is ok)
Greetings
Markus
 

Re: I am tired, I am really tired...

"David Dean [CodeGear]" <XXXX@XXXXX.COM>writes
Quote
This is also in a situation where it has been over a year since BDS
2006 was released. The number of fixes that will come with the next
version should be substantial. I have high expectations.
"next version"... That is probably not very good news to the owners of BDS
2006.
Regards, Mike Niemann
 

Re: I am tired, I am really tired...

Quote
My checkbook is open... Just say "Type Library editor bugs are fixed" and
the check will be in the mail the next day...
What is the QC number? The Type Library Editor area has 54 QC reports, 21
open and 28 closed and only 4 reported. If its open, then there's a good
chance it is going to get fixed.
 

Re: I am tired, I am really tired...

Quote
What can I do? Tons of QC reports. Not fixed. No response. Since Delphi 5
days or 1999.
If you find reproducible QCs which are not open or incorrectly closed, bring
them up in the .qualiycentral group (as you already did) and I will try my
best to get them opened/corrected.
Besides it is always a good idea to "advertise" for reports which are
important. The more votes a report gets, the higher the chances it is going
to get fixed.
 

Re: I am tired, I am really tired...

"Mike Niemann" <XXXX@XXXXX.COM>writes
Quote
"David Dean [CodeGear]" <XXXX@XXXXX.COM>writes
news:XXXX@XXXXX.COM...

>This is also in a situation where it has been over a year since BDS
>2006 was released. The number of fixes that will come with the next
>version should be substantial. I have high expectations.

"next version"... That is probably not very good news to the owners of BDS
2006.

Regards, Mike Niemann


I agree.
Regards, Do-wan Kim.
 

Re: I am tired, I am really tired...

Sebastian Modersohn writes:
Quote
>What can I do? Tons of QC reports. Not fixed. No response. Since Delphi 5
>days or 1999.

If you find reproducible QCs which are not open or incorrectly closed, bring
them up in the .qualiycentral group (as you already did) and I will try my
best to get them opened/corrected.

Besides it is always a good idea to "advertise" for reports which are
important. The more votes a report gets, the higher the chances it is going
to get fixed.

--
Sebastian


I did this for years. But waiting 4 years for the fix is a kind of
torture...
 

Re: I am tired, I am really tired...

"Nathaniel L. Walker" <XXXX@XXXXX.COM>writes
Quote
Chee Wee [CodeGear] writes:
>Nick Hodges (CodeGear) writes:
>
>>Some things to note:
>>
>>1. Many QC reports are in fact feature requests
>>2. Many QC reports are automated incident reports which, right now,
>>have no way of being verified and thus marked "Fixed".
>>3. Many QC reports are fixed but not marked as such.
>
>4. Many QC entries are reports without test cases.
>5. Many QC entries are requests for help on how to do something.

I think Nick has it right when he says that there needs to be alot more
SysOp'ing going on.
Sure. No one's arguing about that. OTOH, I think QC is definitely
going in the right direction. It started out as a fledgling effort and
is rapidly picking up speed. It is getting more and more integrated
into their other processes.
I for one don't fault it for not being mature yet. It has a long way
to go, and there will be more growing pains before it is done.
Quote
Fixed QC reports not marked as fixxed, there is absolutely no reason for
this to be going on.
??? You've got to be kidding. I have less than 2000 bug reports
in our system, with a lot less people entering them and a lot less
people working on them, and no automated reports, and I
can't ever seem to keep just those up to date.
All I cna say is that we work hard at it, and yet QC appears to me
to be more up to date than our system. It is just really difficult
to do. It can not be automated, which means that you are relying
on humans being consistent (translated: Doomed to failure).
Quote
Automated incident reports marked as Fixed? Why? You say no way of being
verified, but they definitely weren't "verified" as being fixxed, correct.

You are correct, but I think you misread his remark.
I stumbled over the same point and had to go back and re-read it.
"Many QC reports are automated incident reports which, right now,
have no way of being verified "
I think that we agree that this is correct.
"and thus (have no way of being) marked 'Fixed'."
Remember this is in the context of explaining why there are
a lot of issues not "fixed."
--
HTH,
Brad.
 

Re: I am tired, I am really tired...

Quote
I did this for years. But waiting 4 years for the fix is a kind of
torture...
I understand that you're frustrated, but without specifics there's not much
to be done. So can you come up with a short list of your most pressing
issues?