Board index » delphi » Re: Update 3 - The performance update
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]
Delphi Developer |
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]
Delphi Developer |
Re: Update 3 - The performance update2005-05-13 12:35:00 AM delphi91 At 17:53:44, 12.05.2005, Ed Dressel writes: Quote>Bugs that have never been reported have zero chance of getting fixed. them. -- Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] "Not even computers will replace committees, because committees buy computers." -- Unknown |
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]
Delphi Developer |
2005-05-13 12:37:55 AM
Re: Update 3 - The performance update
At 15:13:15, 12.05.2005, Alvaro GP writes:
QuoteNick Hodges [TeamB] writes: and these are the kinds of statements like "Delphi is unusable". Why? Because the chance of a bad impression, of rumours starting, etc. is already a problem for Borland, and this is their server, not yours. -- Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] "Early to rise, Early to bed, Makes a man healthy but socially dead." -- The Warner Brothers (Animaniacs) |
Nick Hodges [TeamB]
Delphi Developer |
2005-05-13 12:52:20 AM
Re: Update 3 - The performance update
Ingvar Nilsen writes:
QuoteD2005 is usable/unusble can never be a fact, Nick Hodges -- TeamB Lemanix Corporation -- www.lemanix.com Read my Blog -- www.lemanix.com/nick |
Nick Hodges [TeamB]
Delphi Developer |
2005-05-13 12:52:20 AM
Re: Update 3 - The performance update
Ingvar Nilsen writes:
Quotea friendly advice. Nick Hodges -- TeamB Lemanix Corporation -- www.lemanix.com Read my Blog -- www.lemanix.com/nick |
Nick Hodges [TeamB]
Delphi Developer |
2005-05-13 12:52:21 AM
Re: Update 3 - The performance update
Alvaro GP writes:
QuoteAlso evidenced by all the recent posts about the issue of appending -- Nick Hodges -- TeamB Lemanix Corporation -- www.lemanix.com Read my Blog -- www.lemanix.com/nick |
Nick Hodges [TeamB]
Delphi Developer |
2005-05-13 12:52:21 AM
Re: Update 3 - The performance update
Ed Dressel writes:
Quotethe bugs I have seen are at QC but for a long time there was no Nick Hodges -- TeamB Lemanix Corporation -- www.lemanix.com Read my Blog -- www.lemanix.com/nick |
Billb
Delphi Developer |
2005-05-13 02:06:50 AM
Re: Update 3 - The performance updateQuoteIngvar Nilsen in <428392aa$XXXX@XXXXX.COM>writes: |
Ingvar Nilsen
Delphi Developer |
2005-05-13 02:30:03 AM
Re: Update 3 - The performance update
Nick Hodges [TeamB] writes:
QuoteIngvar Nilsen writes: -- Ingvar Nilsen www.ingvarius.com |
Crazy Horse's crazier little brother
Delphi Developer |
2005-05-13 03:13:41 AM
Re: Update 3 - The performance updateQuote>X does not work for me. Quote>X does not work. -- Download Blackbird Crow Raven's book "STILL CASTING SHADOWS: Two American Families 1620-2006" (.exe and Delphi source): cc.borland.com/ccweb.exe/listing "Nick Hodges [TeamB]" <XXXX@XXXXX.COM>writes |
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]
Delphi Developer |
2005-05-13 03:14:40 AM
Re: Update 3 - The performance update
At 12:27:48, 12.05.2005, Ingvar Nilsen writes:
QuoteD2005 is usable/unusble can never be a fact Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] "It's strange, isn't it. You stand in the middle of a library and go 'aaaaagghhhh' and everyone just stares at you. But you do the same thing on an aeroplane, and everyone joins in." -- Tommy Cooper |
Ed Dressel
Delphi Developer |
2005-05-13 05:14:40 AM
Re: Update 3 - The performance updateQuote>the bugs I have seen are at QC but for a long time there was no this is a side point to the initial point). |
Brion L. Webster
Delphi Developer |
2005-05-13 06:00:34 AM
Re: Update 3 - The performance update
Ed Dressel writes:
QuoteAnd I don't use QC--too many items there have lingered too long seemed like it didn't have new releases. I think a lot of people expected fast turnaround on QC reports, and that just didn't happen. However, service packs issued since QC have included lots of QC numbers, showing that reporting things in QC is a good way of (eventually) getting them fixed. The voting thing is something we (the community) argue about from time to time - most everyone would like to fix every bug, but that doesn't seem to be economically feasible. So other than a Borland person deciding priorities, how else do we tell them how important the bug is compared to other ones? it is not perfect, but I can not think of a better solution. -Brion |
JED
Delphi Developer |
2005-05-13 06:22:26 AM
Re: Update 3 - The performance update
Billb writes:
QuoteYou read the following 2 -- www.jed-software.com |
Nick Hodges [TeamB]
Delphi Developer |
2005-05-13 06:34:28 AM
Re: Update 3 - The performance update
Ed Dressel writes:
Quoteso am I mistaken (could be) that when QC was first opened items were upon becuase they aren't ever opened. Again, I would love to see five reports you think should be at least opened, and I will try to open them. -- Nick Hodges -- TeamB Lemanix Corporation -- www.lemanix.com Read my Blog -- www.lemanix.com/nick |
Ed Dressel
Delphi Developer |
2005-05-13 07:00:31 AM
Re: Update 3 - The performance updateQuoteAgain, I would love to see five reports you think should be at least pony show then anything else (I can't imagine how my customers would react if I opened up voting for their favorite bugs). But that history, obivously. |
Alvaro GP
Delphi Developer |
2005-05-13 07:11:01 AM
Re: Update 3 - The performance update
Nick Hodges [TeamB] writes:
QuoteIf one is rude, snide, childish, and vulgar, one can expect that the |
Anders Ohlsson (Borland)
Delphi Developer |
2005-05-13 07:38:07 AM
Re: Update 3 - The performance update
Please take these problems to off-topic. Thanks!
QuoteCuriously, I don't use to have problems with anyone, except you and homepages.borland.com/aohlsson/blog_beta/ |